Radius ex fix - Finsen

Go to content

Radius ex fix

Alle deler > BILL > Studier > Hånd abs
Hove LM, Krukhaug Y, Revheim K, Helland K, Finsen V.
DYNAMIC COMPARED WITH STATIC EXTERNAL FIXATION OF UNSTABLE FRACTURES OF THE DISTAL PART OF THE RADIUS. A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTRE STUDY
J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2010; 92-A: 1687-96

Background: External fixation is an established method of treating certain types  of distal radial fractures. We have designed a dynamic  external fixator to treat these fractures. The purpose of the present study was to  compare this devicewith current static bridging external  fixators in terms of anatomical and functional results.
Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized study  to compare the radiographic and clinical results of dynamicexternal fixation with those of static external fixation for the  treatment of seventy unstable distal radial fractures. Mobilization of the  wrist was begun in the dynamic fixator group on the day after surgery. The  external fixation frames were kept in place for a mean of six weeks. The  patients were assessed clinically and radiographically at the time of removal  of thefixator and at three, six, and twelve  months.
Results: Dynamic fixation resulted in a significantly  better restoration of radial length at all follow-up visits in comparisonwith static fixation. There were no significant differences in  radial tilt or radial inclination between the two groups. Wrist flexion,  radial deviation, and pronation-supination were regained significantly faster  in the dynamic fixator group. Wrist extension was significantly better in the  dynamic fixator group in comparison with the static fixator group at all  follow-up times. Self-evaluation with use of the Disabilities of the Arm,  Shoulder and Hand score and a visual analog pain score demonstrated no significant  differences between the two groups at the time of the latest follow-up.  Superficial pin-track infections were significantly more common in the  dynamic external fixator group than in the static fixator group.
     
Conclusions: Continuous dynamic traction with a dynamic external fixator compares  favorably with the use of static external fixators for the treatment of  unstable fractures of the distal part of the radius.
Back to content